|Mirror [#1]||Social Justice Without Socialism.pdf||41,641 KB/Sec|
|Mirror [#2]||Social Justice Without Socialism.pdf||37,383 KB/Sec|
|Mirror [#3]||Social Justice Without Socialism.pdf||39,333 KB/Sec|
It came into use in the thirties of the last century, and expressed a certain disappointment over the result of political reform. The bill which gave more men the right to vote did not give them higher wages. The conditions of labor were deplorable before the Reform Bill was passed and they continued to be so for some time afterwards. A merely political change, therefore, was not all that was wanted, and it was necessary to carry democracy into a social sphere in order to improve the condition of the poorer classes. The term "Socialism", therefore, was chosen to describe a play of forces that would act in this way on society itself, and was an excellent term for describing this right and just tendency. The name was quickly adopted by those with whose practical plans most of us do not agree; but its original idea was democracy carried into business, and at present that is the dominant tendency of all successful parties.